Real Housewives of Camelot County

Three hours is a long time. Thankfully, The Theater Company filled three hours with the impeccable music and lyrics of Alan Jay Lerner and Frederick Loewe in their production of Camelot. Also thankfully, TTC’s lead characters were darn good singers who didn’t butcher any of the impeccable music and lyrics. Further thankfully, TTC is apparently not content to rest on its laurels and maintain the status quo; they seem to be working to outperform the last production and the one before that. Clap, clap, TTC, for striving for excellence. And finally thankfully, The Phantom has always been a big phan of this show, and he enjoyed this production very much. But thankfully (Oops. The Phantom appears to have been mistaken regarding the penultimate “thankfully.” Devoted readers of this insightful site will undoubtedly be startled to encounter any hint of imprecision. They know The Phantom to be a careful, conscientious and clever fellow. But do not be concerned, dear Phans, it was a rare lapse. Yes, The Phantom makes the occasional misstep. He made an error last year, and now here’s one in ’08. They do happen, you know. We’re only human. The Phantom hopes that you will forgive him and perhaps forget that this ever happened. He has. Where were we? Oh yes.) for you, dear Phans, the Phantom was not humming along with his eyes closed. Stay tuned. He has a quibble or two about the show.

Everyone was good. Yes, everyone. Some were gooder than others, but the overall grade for the show (actors, orchestra, sets, tech, quality of intermission snacks) was an impressive B++. (Come see the teacher after school and let’s see if we can’t get that up to an A minus. Bring cash and cookies.)

In scene one (settle in and stay with us here; there are 17 scenes, and yes, it’s a lot, it’s Cam-a-lot!) [Insert “badda-boom” drum shot sound here.], we are introduced to the cast of thousands, spilling out into the audience as is the modus operandi of the TTC director; it’s a fine way to add dimension to a play but unfortunate for those seated on an aisle when their only view is the backside of Chorus Member Number 37. Then, out of what is quite possibly the most splendid tree to grace any community/regional (oh, don’t get that old chestnut started again) [Badda-boom.] {“Tree” and “chesnut.” Get it? The Phantom is on a pun-a-licious role tonight. Y’all try to keep up.} theater, comes Arthur/Wart. We’ve never seen this handsome dude in the Brazos Valley before, but we are eagerly looking forward to seeing him again. Why, he could sing! And sing well. He could act. And act really well. His accent at the start of the show was pip-pip spot on. And if my female companion is to be believed, he was quite attractive in a chiseled, brooding, sexy, dark sort of way. The Phantom admits that he is annoyed by this, not because his own rugged masculine appeal is in doubt, but because The Phantom’s date for the day was his own sweet, aged-yet-still-feisty mother. Goodness, Mom, rein it in. Contain your man-made and doctor-prescribed hormones! Yes, Arthur was terrific. At least he was until scene 9, when he started to channel Sean Connery, an affliction that pursued him until the end of the show. (You can’t channel Sean. He may be retired, but he’s not dead yet!) Sadly, Arthur’s mush-mouthed Scottish accent became hard to follow, especially toward the end when he sought to be impassioned. What happened to the quiet simplicity of the original accent? Oh, Mom, quit whining. You know I’ve asked you not to read this over my shoulder. Okay, okay, I won’t put you back in the basement! Okay, you’re right, Arthur was great.

The Phantom preferred to rest his eyes on our leading lady. A magnificent Arthur deserves a magnificent Guenevere, and magnificent she was. She could sing (beautifully) and she could act. We hope we get to see her in a variety of other shows.

Yep, Guenevere was lovely and talented. We’ll gladly buy a ticket to see her again.

There were just one or two small things we noted. In this role, with this Arthur, we’re afraid she came off like one of those Real Housewives of Orange County, the ones with the collagen lips, the Botoxed foreheads, the concrete hair spray and the overdone faces. She was overly Fabulous. Worse, she was haughty, not innocent, of dubious age, uncharming and petulant, not precocious. The Phantom is certain that Guenevere should be a fiery young girl filled with a false bravado that only adds to her evident charm and intelligence. Not an in-your-face, neck-snapping bee-yotch. But man, oh, man, she could work those songs. So, in the spirit of the Lenten season, we forgive her. Guenevere, you were rocking the hair that never moved, and if we had been seated in the balcony of a considerably larger theater we would have never come to the tacky conclusion that you were an experienced Cougar stalking your younger Arthur. Maybe it was the lighting.

Merlin also made his appearance early in the first act, played by an old favorite of the valley, complete with messy white wig and long beard. He did a very nice job, and, blissfully, we did not notice any of the facial distortion that is this actor’s Achilles Heel (and the audience’s Hell). [Ba-Bum!] We like you, Merlin, we really do. You are so likable and notable that we were slightly disconcerted when you returned from the clutches of Nimue as a very visible and different character knight. True, it’s hard to lose you in a crowd, but was it really necessary for you to play two roles? Maybe, maybe not. We are not sure this time.

Nimue made a brief appearance with a lovely song, faithfully executed by another regular to the TTC stage. We think, in a Monday-morning-quarterback sort of way, that this young lady could have also done a fine job as Guenevere if the casting had gone differently. She’s growing up and has never failed to entertain us.

Speaking of regulars: Ta-DAH! Here comes Lancelot, played by none other than [fill in the blank here as you wish. For editorial clarity, we will quietly mention that we are referring, of course, to Sweet Cheeks. Let’s just keep that between us, though, because The Phantom has been scolded, on his own pages, no less, for his use of this nickname, apparently taken by The Phantom’s critics {WHAT?? There are some? Why?} to be a derisive sobriquet. However, truth be told, we are fond of this actor, who is always earnest and well-intentioned, and we straightforwardly assert that it is not his fault that he has too often been cast in roles that begged for an older, more seasoned veteran of romantic relationships. So, perhaps it is time to retire the nickname. The Phantom promises never to use it again. Is that alright with you, Sweet Cheeks?]. The Phantom was delighted and heartily amused when Mr. Cheeks performed “C’est Moi” to perfection. Clap, clap and clap again, Lancelot. Well done, indeed.

Alas and alack, this turns out to be a tricky role that requires Lancelot to make a paradigm shift from an over-the-top, self-righteous virgin to an introspective and guilt-ridden lover. And that shift proved, The Phantom regrets to announce, to be too much for this favorite son of TTC. Again, as on every other occasion in which he has been asked to portray a character who was consumed by a love that was full of passion, he gave us a wooden and stiff (and not in a good way) performance when it came to the delicate scenes between Lance and Guenevere. It’s a tough gig, Sweetness. It’s hard to be intimate with someone when you’re a bit young and you have 400 eyes staring at you. We have faith that you will learn to ignore the audience and wrap yourself in the tender moments between two lovers.

Pellinore. Where have you been? You were terrific! We thought your performance was right on the mark in spite of being slightly upstaged by Horrid, who possessed the quiet sensibility of all great actors. When he noticed the nuances contained in Horrid’s tremulous tail wag, The Phantom could hardly keep from jumping to his feet and yelling, Bravo! Bravo, Horrid, bravo!

As we have a taken a moment to mention a dog, we’ll also acknowledge an unsung hero of this production, the program. This trend of programs being cleverly written began with StageCenter, but imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and we were tickled when the Camelot program gave a listing to the dog and a couch. Very clever.

Back to the matter at hand: The first act of Camelot went on until Scene 10, and those of us who had a cocktail (or three) before the show were blinking away tears of bathroom desperation. But we didn’t want to leave early. The songs of Camelot are so wonderful one is reluctant to miss a word.

Act Two is darker and shorter, especially if you dump a scene, but the quality of the singing held fast. We understood rewarding snatches of Arthur’s dialogue. We met Mordred, the obnoxious bastard child of Arthur. He was as advertised, and we can only hope he was acting. (We have sometimes been surprised to find that the stellar “acting” job we saw on stage was just someone being themselves.) During Mordred’s scene with Morgan Le Fey, he did a random leap that left us startled. True, it was a good leap, but leaping for leaping’s sake is just odd. Later, we learned that our intrepid Mordred is a trained dancer. Ahh, it all comes together in a random and thoroughly unnecessary manner. Never mind. The Phantom is left scratching his big ol’ melon head.

Morgan Le Fey was the brunette cousin to Glenda the Good Witch, which is not the way the part is written. Too pretty, too high-pitched and we didn’t buy her gluttony. This actress is a hottie. Stick to hottie parts.

The orchestra did a fine job, accompanying rather than competing with the cast. The love songs and the fun songs were all sung beautifully. A professional troupe could not have done better.

The set was not a distraction, with the possible exception of our actors being stuck up in the stratosphere for a couple of scenes on that back wall. The lighting was weak and disjointed, however, and too often, actors were left in the dark. However, the burning and rescue scene was surreal and wonderfully dramatic as it should be. We were, in fact, entertained. Thank you, TTC, for an enjoyable show.

Other than that, it was great.

The Phantom

Published in:  on March 13, 2008 at 3:56 am Comments (22)

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://bcsphantom.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/real-housewives-of-camelot-county/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

22 Comments Leave a comment.

  1. Thank you, O Phantasmagorical One! I relished your kind words as a thirsty man relishes his favorite scotch. But what’s up with that obsession you have about J. Paul’s facial expressions? For the life of me, I can’t see what you meant in the extended tongue-lashing you gave him in the Christmas Carol review.

    Still, I’m gratified by your attentions to this show, and to area productions in general. Being a critic might be a dirty job, but somebody has to do it, and it’s nice to have it done by someone with such refined and nearly impeccable taste.

    I have the pleasure to remain,

    yr. obt. svt.,

    King Pelly

  2. I had a dream….that a past Arthur found himself in the position of critiquing a present Arthur, who was more handsome and could actually sing. Other than that, the Phantom is becoming way too kind. Perhaps after 10 years of being a critic, he will love everybody and everything.

  3. Dear aisle audience members,

    Sorry you didn’t enjoy the view.

    Love,
    Foo “Chorus Member Number 37″

  4. So Butler, did you like the show or not? I don’t know who this old arthur is but its pretty clear why the Eagle fired you from critcising shows. You can’t make a clear argument either way. Its also clear that you are NOT the phantom. Quit trying to out him. We don’t want to have to go back to having nothing to read about when it comes to theater with the exception of your dull preview articles in the Spotlight.

    And I’m not afraid to sign my name,

    Jeff Hunt

  5. Jim, I was in Camelot 10 years ago and I don’t think it’s very fair of you to compare the two productions. It’s like comparing apples to oranges. And as far as that Arthur being the phantom you couldn’t be more wrong. That Arthur is one of the nicest guys I have ever met and has been an avid supporter and participant in the arts of the Brazos Valley for years. It looks to me like you are the hateful one here.

    -Chorus Member No. 7 (the theater was alot smaller back then :)

  6. Wow!!! X-TREEEM blogging. Now this is ENTERTAINMENT!!!

  7. Dull preview articles actually IN the Spotlight??? You only wish it could be that dull again. The Spotlight on local theatre has been turned off for quite some time now.

  8. I love it! Jim Butler calling out another theatre reviewer for “becoming way to kind”. Now don’t that just beat all.

  9. Apparently, my sarcasm was too well-disguised. My bad. Actually, I thought Camelot was outstanding. The lead actors are extremely talented and the supporting cast was flawless. Joe Shepherd continues to mature and become a performer of impressive versatility. I concur on “C’est Moi!” C’est tres bon! The orchestra continues to be one of the best things about TTC. Now, what did you expect me to say?

  10. Give Jim a break ya’ll! He has always supported this theatre.
    Nicole Norton

  11. Also, Jim doesn’t need to out the phantom. Who doesn’t know who the phantom is?

  12. Meanwhile, back to the real topic…
    Phantom, as usual, employs excessive verbage but gets it right. CAMELOT is NOT a favorite of mine, but the strong singing and orchestra made it a treat.
    Bravo to Guenevere – strong from start to end – and Arthur who was strong but the weight of the pathos must have loosened his dentures (AKA Sean Connery effect) making him VERY hard to understand, and Act II is just so slo-o-ow.
    “Merrily We Roll Along” isn’t likely to be lighter, but I know it’ll be good, and hope it’ll be shorter.
    Keep up the good work TTC! You’re putting out the best entertainment value in town.
    BTW: Nicole, I prefer to not know Pantom’s true identity, so please don’t reveal it.

  13. Don’t worry Lovely Linda….judging from her choice of words, Nicole (and i agree with the Phantom, she IS hot) has no clue who the Phantom is. In fact, why does everyone assume that the Phantom is just ONE person?

  14. The Phantom used to be two, then they became one.

  15. Might happen, but it hasn’t yet. And it would be against the law in most states.

  16. The Phantom is amused.

  17. that second comment was NOT from me…someone jacked my persona Phantom. I am NOT amused!

  18. Just out of curiosity, did you see Make Me a Match?

  19. Speaking of Stagecenter, trust me, make a point of seeing La Turista!

  20. If you do see “La Turista”, be sure to take some heavy sedatives. My head still hurts from not knowing WHAT THE HECK WAS GOING ON!

  21. La Turista was well-directed, well-acted, and energetic. My group is going back to see it again.
    I recommend it, but it’s not for those who only love the ordinary.

  22. The Phantom’s posting for La Turista has got to be the most eagerly anticipated review for a StageCenter show since the phantom started his blog.

    Caught a performance and was quite impressed by all aspects of the production. The themes of Sam Shepard and absurdism in general are not easy to grasp but the strong commitment the actors invested in their characters was quite evident and very admirable.

    Really enjoyed the lighting and sound designs for this show. Nice changes and underscoring. The technical elements when used effectively can add so much to a production. And the costuming was very good as well.

    Hats off to the director for a splendid offering and to StageCenter for producing choices like this.

    And it was great to have now seen Silas Moores on all three local stages. I wish there was more of that.


Leave a Comment